Mathematical variants in potionsmaking
Dec. 11th, 2008 08:50 pmSally was talking earlier about how she has trouble when it comes to preparing them. So what if we timed thousands of wizards and got the average of, say, 1 counterclockwise stir. Of how long the standard (by which all texts will be written to that standard). THEN you create a spell that times the actual wizard's time against the predetermined mathmetical standard and compensates for it? I was thinking like an equation such as Aurelius Assisi's from 70 AD when he was studying Imhotep's pyramid theorum that said all things being equal, you can build on mathmetical coordinates from other pyramids to create them exactly one like the other. Well, some scholars say it doesn't cite Imhotep its just that he was old and had a small seizure while writing.
What do you think? Professor Slughorn, thoughts?
What do you think? Professor Slughorn, thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:36 am (UTC)Youre going to get creamed on that test and you know it!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:11 am (UTC)Pansy, come off it, that's mean. I mean it. Stop being such a swot!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:33 am (UTC)What does a single counterclockwise stir have to do with making a potion? Or pyramids, for that matter?
Assisi wasn't a Potioneer, either, he was an Arithmancist. Stop copying out of books, that's
plaigplayplagiarism. You can get detention for that, Parkinson.no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:46 am (UTC)Almost.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 04:50 am (UTC)Go me.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 08:11 pm (UTC)However this level of theory, as I said, is more suited to NEWT level understanding, not least because of the role of arithmancy, which you have yet to begin studying.
I don't believe the Ministry are currently undertaking any work in this area. You have at least five years in which to learn the best way to stir your potions - you will have to take my word for it, I'm afraid, but most witches and wizards do master it in the end. A spell would therefore seem unnecessary, as well as potentially having unforeseen side effects, as the interaction of spells and potions is often wont to do.
If you are genuinely interested in this, I can lend you an introductory text on potions theory. It won't answer the questions you've asked here, but it will start to lay the foundations for your later learning. It's no easy read, however, and I wouldn't normally recommend it for anyone below third year, so do think carefully about whether you're really ready and sufficiently interested. If not, we can return to this in a few years time.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 08:13 pm (UTC)Thank you for answering my questions, Professor, and for being so kind when Mum fell ill.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-12 08:33 pm (UTC)Arithmancy is a complicated subject. I'm sure when the time comes you'll enjoy it greatly, but the foundations of your other subjects must be in place first or it won't make a shred of sense!